📋 Report card
Every way this site points at a share, held to one question: did following it beat simply buying any share on the same days and holding as long? Averages per trade after 0.40% brokerage, on dividend-adjusted prices. Where a tool did not work, it says so.
| Tool | Held for | Cases | Its result | Any share, same days | Difference | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| What the numbers say: top five
The five highest verdict scores each day (back-test) |
5 sessions | 2,280 | +0.17% | -0.12% | +0.29% | – No real edge |
| Sound company on a dip
Fundamentals 60+, price 8% or more below its 20-day average (back-test) |
5 sessions | 804 | +1.61% | -0.12% | +1.73% | ✓ Worked |
| What the numbers say: top five
The five highest verdict scores each day (back-test) |
20 sessions | 2,205 | +2.55% | +0.93% | +1.62% | ✓ Worked |
| Sound company on a dip
Fundamentals 60+, price 8% or more below its 20-day average (back-test) |
20 sessions | 803 | +3.68% | +0.93% | +2.75% | ✓ Worked |
| Top five as actually published
The names the dashboard really showed on the day |
5 sessions | 15 | +0.88% | -0.12% | +1.00% | ? Too few cases |
| MACD crossed upward
A buying setup on the signals page |
10 sessions | 4,498 | +0.14% | +0.21% | -0.07% | – No real edge |
| Lost its 50-day average
A warning setup: it worked if the share then did worse than the rest |
10 sessions | 4,425 | -1.40% | +0.21% | -1.61% | ✓ Worked |
| Heavy selling
A warning setup: it worked if the share then did worse than the rest |
10 sessions | 1,342 | -3.98% | +0.21% | -4.19% | ✓ Worked |
| Held a price that stopped falls before
A buying setup on the signals page |
10 sessions | 996 | -0.57% | +0.21% | -0.79% | – No real edge |
| Broke above its 20-day high on heavy volume
A buying setup on the signals page |
10 sessions | 4,538 | +1.18% | +0.21% | +0.97% | – No real edge |
| Overbought and stalling
A warning setup: it worked if the share then did worse than the rest |
10 sessions | 726 | -2.62% | +0.21% | -2.84% | ✓ Worked |
| Oversold, but still in an uptrend
A buying setup on the signals page |
10 sessions | 535 | -0.39% | +0.21% | -0.60% | – No real edge |
| Sound company on a dip
A starting rule in the Strategy Lab |
20 sessions | 269 | +1.86% | +0.97% | +0.89% | – No real edge |
| RSI below 30
A starting rule in the Strategy Lab |
20 sessions | 915 | -0.15% | +0.97% | -1.12% | ✗ Did worse |
| Cheap and profitable
A starting rule in the Strategy Lab |
20 sessions | 535 | +1.18% | +0.97% | +0.21% | – No real edge |
| High dividend yield
A starting rule in the Strategy Lab |
20 sessions | 425 | +0.90% | +0.97% | -0.07% | – No real edge |
| Already rising
A starting rule in the Strategy Lab |
20 sessions | 2,388 | +1.58% | +0.97% | +0.61% | – No real edge |
| Verdict score 75 or more
A starting rule in the Strategy Lab |
20 sessions | 2,106 | +1.35% | +0.97% | +0.38% | – No real edge |
| After results: Profit without operating cash
The middle case, from the last close before the notice, against the middle share |
20 sessions | 187 | +0.40% | 0.00% | +0.40% | – No real edge |
| After results: Fell into a loss
The middle case, from the last close before the notice, against the middle share |
20 sessions | 139 | -0.55% | 0.00% | -0.55% | – No real edge |
| After results: Profit up 25% or more
The middle case, from the last close before the notice, against the middle share |
20 sessions | 355 | +1.74% | 0.00% | +1.74% | ✓ Worked |
| After results: Back to profit
The middle case, from the last close before the notice, against the middle share |
20 sessions | 80 | +1.42% | 0.00% | +1.42% | ✓ Worked |
Worked means at least one percentage point a trade better than any share (worse, for a warning). Back-tests replay the rule on the stored history; the published rows are the names the site really showed on the day. Results reactions are measured against the market already, so any share counts as nil there. A past result is a measurement, not a promise.